Umile Giuseppe Longo, Di Benedetto, M., Lavorato, M., de Sire, A., & D’Hooghe, P. Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: Innovations, Outcomes, and Challenges – A Comprehensive Review. Journal of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine. doi: Retrieved from https://ojs2.sciltp.com/journals/jorsm/article/view/1179
Copyright (c) 2025 by the authors.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) reliably relieves pain in end-stage knee osteoarthritis. Still up to 20% of patients report persistent dissatisfaction due to factors like component malalignment or soft-tissue imbalance. Robotic-assisted TKA has emerged to enhance surgical precision and enable patient-specific alignment strategies beyond the traditionally targeted neutral mechanical alignment.

Purpose: To synthesize current knowledge on the role of robotic systems in TKA, including technological classifications, clinical outcomes, safety profile, economic considerations, and adoption challenges.

Methods: A narrative literature review was conducted based on recent peer-reviewed publications, primarily focusing on robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Articles were selected to reflect clinical outcomes, technological advances, surgical workflow evolution, and perioperative considerations related to robotic systems. While the review emphasizes robotic platforms, additional sources addressing conventional TKA were included to provide relevant clinical context. Included literature comprised systematic reviews, meta-analyses, registry reports, and cohort studies.

Results: Semi-active robotic TKA systems consistently improve bone-cutting accuracy and alignment precision, dramatically reducing alignment outliers beyond 3° of neutral compared to conventional techniques. Robotic TKA has been associated with reduced early postoperative pain, faster recovery, and shorter hospital stays. Mid-term outcomes appear equivalent or slightly improved relative to conventional TKA, with similar safety profiles.

Conclusion: Robotic-assisted TKA enhances surgical precision and early recovery without increasing complication risk. Long-term benefits, overall cost-effectiveness, and broad applicability of this technology remain under investigation.

Keywords:

Robotic-assisted surgery Total knee arthroplasty Clinical outcomes Cost-effectiveness

References

  1. Bellemans, J.; Colyn, W.; Vandenneucker, H.; et al. The Chitranjan Ranawat award: Is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2012, 470, 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-1936-5.
  2. SMacDessi, J.; Griffiths-Jones, W.; Harris, I.A.; et al. Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification. Bone Joint J. 2021, 103, 329–337. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.103B2.BJJ-2020-1050.R1.
  3. Schmerler, J.; Bergstein, V.E.; Kagabo, W.; et al. Access to robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty varies significantly by race/ethnicity. Knee Surg. Relat. Res. 2025, 37, 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43019-024-00255-0.
  4. Mart, J.P.S.; Goh, E.L. The current state of robotics in total knee arthroplasty. EFORT Open Rev. 2021, 6, 270–279. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.6.200052.
  5. He, R.; Sun, M.L.; Xiong, R.; et al. A Newly Designed “SkyWalker” Robot Applied in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study for Femoral Rotational Alignment Restoration. Orthop. Surg. 2022, 14, 1681–1694. https://doi.org/10.1111/os.13365.
  6. Daxini, A.; Mahajan, U. Initial Experience with VELYS Robot-Assisted Total Knee Replacement: Coronal Plane Accuracy and Effect of Robotic Training on Outcomes. Cureus 2024, 16, e76323. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.76323.
  7. Maciąg, B.M.; Kordyaczny, T.; Maciąg, G.J.; et al. Comparison of Femoral Component Rotation between Robotic-Assisted vs. Soft-Tissue Tensor Total Knee Arthroplasty with Anatomic Implants. Medicina 2023, 59, 880. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina
  8. Baek, J.H.; Lee, S.C.; Ryu, S.; et al. Coronal Correction for Post-Traumatic Malalignment Using Robot-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Case Series. Orthop. Res. Rev. 2022, 14, 445–451. https://doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S387957.
  9. Selvanathan, N.; Ayeni, F.E.; Sorial, R. Incidence of soft tissue releases in robotic assisted cementless TKA with mechanical alignment and flexion gap balancing. Arthroplasty 2023, 5, 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-023-00188-1.
  10. Kayani, B.; Konan, S.; Tahmassebi, J.; et al. Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved early functional recovery and reduced time to hospital discharge compared with conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty: A prospective cohort study. Bone Joint. J. 2018, 100, 930–937. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.100B7.BJJ-2017-1449.R1.
  11. Stoltz, M.J.; Smith, N.S.; Abhari, S.; et al. Patient-Reported Outcomes in Robotic-Assisted vs. Manual Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty. Arthroplast. Today 2024, 30, 101488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2024.101488.
  12. Xu, J.Z.; Li, L.L.; Fu, J.; et al. Comparison of serum inflammatory indicators and radiographic results in MAKO robotic-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty for knee osteoarthritis: A retrospective study of Chinese patients. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2022, 23, 418. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05373-y.
  13. Joo, P.Y.; Chen, A.F.; Richards, J.; et al. Clinical results and patient-reported outcomes following robotic-assisted primary total knee arthroplasty: A multicentre study. Bone Jt. Open 2022, 3, 589–595. https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.37.bjo-2022-0076.r1.
  14. Jung, H.J.; Kang, M.W.; Lee, J.H.; et al. Learning curve of robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty and its effects on implant position in asian patients: A prospective study. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2023, 24, 332. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06422-w.
  15. Dragosloveanu, S.; Petre, M.A.; Capitanu, B.S.; et al. Initial Learning Curve for Robot-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty in a Dedicated Orthopedics Center. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 6950. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12216950.
  16. Zhang, H.; Bai, X.; Wang, H.; et al. Learning curve analysis of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty with a Chinese surgical system. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2023, 18, 900. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04382-4.
  17. Longo, U.G.; De Salvatore, S.; Candela, V.; et al. Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Minimal Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State for the Forgotten Joint Score. Medicina 2021, 57, 324. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina570
  18. Aneja, K.; Rudraraju, R.T.; Shyam, A. Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: Innovations, Precision, and the Future of Joint Reconstruction. J. Orthop. Case Rep. 2024, 14, 4–7.
  19. McGraw, P.; Kumar, A. Periprosthetic fractures of the femur after total knee arthroplasty. J. Orthop. Traumatol. 2010, 11, 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10195-010-0099-6.
  20. Simcox, T.; Singh, V.; Oakley, C.T.; et al. A comparison of utilization and short-term complications of technology-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg. Relat. Res. 2022, 34, 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43019-022-00143-5.
  21. Longo, U.G.; Silva, S.; Perdisa, F.; et al. Gender related results in total knee arthroplasty: A 15-year evaluation of the Italian population. Arch. Orthop. Trauma. Surg. 2023, 143, 1185–1192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04222-2.
  22. Maman, D.; Laver, L.; Becker, R.; et al. Trends and epidemiology in robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: Reduced complications and shorter hospital stays. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2024, 32, 3281–3288. https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12353.
  23. Ofa, S.A.; Ross, B.J.; Flick, T.R.; et al. Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty vs Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Nationwide Database Study. Arthroplast. Today 2020, 6, 1001–1008.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2020.09.014.
  24. Hua, Y.; Salcedo, J. Cost-effectiveness analysis of robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0277980. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277980.
  25. Song, E.K.; Seon, J.K.; Yim, J.H.; et al. Robotic-assisted TKA reduces postoperative alignment outliers and improves gap balance compared to conventional TKA. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2013, 471, 118–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2407-3.
  26. Kim, Y.H.; Yoon, S.H.; Park, J.W. Does Robotic-assisted TKA Result in Better Outcome Scores or Long-Term Survivorship Than Conventional TKA? A Randomized, Controlled Trial. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2020, 478, 266–275. https://doi.org/10.1097/corr.0000000000000916.
  27. Fu, X.; She, Y.; Jin, G.; et al. Comparison of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Robot. Surg. 2024, 18, 292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-02045-y.
  28. Chen, J.; Loke, R.W.K.; Lim, K.K.; et al. Survivorship in robotic total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arthroplasty 2025, 7, 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-025-00304-3.
  29. Longo, U.G.; Ciuffreda, M.; D’Andrea, V.; et al. All-polyethylene versus metal-backed tibial component in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2017, 25, 3620–3636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4168-0.
  30. Longo, U.G.; Ciuffreda, M.; Mannering, N.; et al. Outcomes of Posterior-Stabilized Compared with Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty. J. Knee Surg. 2018, 31, 321–340. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1603902.
  31. Zhang, J.; Ndou, W.S.; Ng, N.; et al. Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved accuracy and patient reported outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2022, 30, 2677–2695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06464-4.
  32. Hoeffel, D.; Goldstein, L.; Intwala, D.; et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of economic and healthcare resource utilization outcomes for robotic versus manual total knee arthroplasty. J. Robot. Surg. 2023, 17, 2899–2910. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01703-x.
  33. Longo, U.G.; De Salvatore, S.; Intermesoli, G.; et al. Metaphyseal cones and sleeves are similar in improving short- and mid-term outcomes in Total Knee Arthroplasty revisions. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2023, 31, 861–882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-06914-7.
  34. Longo, U.G.; Ciuffreda, M.; Mannering, N.; et al. Patellar Resurfacing in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Arthroplasty 2018, 33, 620–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.08.041.
  35. Longo, U.G.; De Salvatore, S.; Valente, F.; et al. Artificial intelligence in total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2024, 25, 571. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-07516-9.
  36. Kim, K.; Kim, Y.H.; Park, W.M.; et al. Stress concentration near pin holes associated with fracture risk after computer navigated total knee arthroplasty. Comput. Aided Surg. 2010, 15, 98–103. https://doi.org/10.3109/10929088.2010.515419.